Treatment of recalcitrant ulcers with allogeneic platelet gel from pooled platelets in aged hypomobile patients.

We evaluated growth factor contents and clinical efficacy of allogeneic platelet gel (PG) prepared with standard blood banking procedures from routine platelet concentrates (PCs) obtained from buffy coats. The PGs were used to treat 11 hypomobile very elderly patients unable to undergo autologous blood processing and previously ineffectively treated with expensive advanced medications for 8-275 weeks. PGs were prepared by platelet activation with human thrombin or commercial batroxobin. Median and range growth factor contents (ng/mL) were: platelet derived growth factor (PDGF-AB/-BB) 112 (31-157) and 20 (3.8-34); transforming growth factor (TGF-ß1/-ß2) 214 (48-289) and 0.087 (0.03-0.28); basic-fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF) 0.03 (0.006-0.214); vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) 1.15 (0.18-2.46); epidermal growth factor (EGF) 4.50 (0.87-6.64); insulin-like growth factor (IGF-l) 116 (72-156). In the clinical study, 222 PGs were used within 2 h of activation to treat 14 chronic skin ulcers in the 11 patients. No improvement was seen in 3 patients with 24, 27 and 30 cm(3) ulcers who could be treated for no more than 4, 7 and 8 weeks due to progressively worsening clinical conditions, while 11 ulcers with 3.2 cm(3) median size (range 0.2-3.6) in the remaining 8 patients showed 91 ± 14 % reduction after a median of 12 weeks (range 1-20). Cost of PG treatment (19,976 euro) amounted to about 10% of the ineffective advanced medication hospital reimbursement fees (191,236 euro). This study supports efficacy and feasibility of allogeneic PG to treat recalcitrant ulcers in very elderly hypomobile patients for whom autologous blood processing may be difficult.

Relationship of the time of storage and transfusion reactions to platelet concentrates from buffy coats.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion reactions to platelet concentrates prepared from buffy coats (BC-PCs) were reviewed to determine the effect of some variables of BC-PC preparation and storage: time of BC storage before BC-PC preparation (1-2 days); time of BC-PC storage before transfusion (1-5 days); no white cell reduction versus laboratory and bedside BC-PC white cell reduction. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A multiple linear logistic regression model was used by which the relative effect of one variable is expressed as the relative risk of transfusion reaction against a baseline level (1-day storage, no white cell reduction). RESULTS: During the 14 months of study, a total of 2707 BC-PC transfusions were given to 192 patients; 37 reactions (1.4%) were reported in 25 patients (13%). The transfusion reactions were febrile, nonhemolytic in 23 cases; allergic in 5; febrile and allergic in 2; and other in 7. The relative risk of transfusion reaction to BC-PCs prepared from BCs stored for 2 days was 1.98 times that to BC-PCs prepared from BCs stored for 1 day (p = 0.07). The relative risk of transfusion reaction of 5-day-old BC-PCs was 10.7 times that of 1-day-old BC-PCs (p = 0.001). The relative risk of transfusion reactions of BC-PCs white cell-reduced in the laboratory and at the bedside were 0.65 (p = 0.3) and 1.87 (p = 0.1) times, respectively, that of non-white cell-reduced BC-PCs. CONCLUSION: Time of storage seems to be an important variable associated with BC-PC transfusion reaction.

Use of SERVQUAL to assess clinicians' satisfaction with the blood transfusion service.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Limited information is available on the level of satisfaction of clinicians with services delivered by blood banks. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the satisfaction of clinicians with our blood transfusion service. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prepared a questionnaire based on SERVQUAL, a method used to measure customers' appreciation of quality of service, by assessing the gap between perceived and expected quality. The questionnaire consisted of 14 items grouped according to five dimensions of quality of service: assurance, empathy, responsiveness, reliability, tangibles. Clinicians were asked to give two scores on a scale from 1 to 7 for each item, score (e) representing what they expected from an 'excellent' service, score (r) how they graded the service received. We considered wide differences in scores of service expectation and receipt for a question to be indicative of either service above expected levels (r > e) or service below expectation (r < e); similar scores for both expected and received service (within 1 point on the grading scale) were taken to indicate that the service received was that which was expected. RESULTS: A total of 184 questionnaires (49%) were returned. For the 14 items considered, the proportion of clinicians expressing levels of satisfaction similar to or above expectation ranged from 67 to 96%. Three critical areas, which clinicians considered important (expectation scores 6-7) were associated with satisfaction below expectation in more than 20% of responders. They were: clarity of procedures, clarity of blood request forms, and convenience of blood request and issuing times, which were rated as important by 77, 80 and 72% of clinicians, respectively. CONCLUSION: SERVQUAL was useful to gather information on the level of clinicians' satisfaction with our transfusion service.